Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1002

reference
875-tree-1
name
1002
tree-preservation-order

undefined

875-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.039982 50.873896)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.039954 50.873893,-1.039955 50.873898,-1.039959 50.873903,-1.039965 50.873907,-1.039973 50.873910,-1.039982 50.873911,-1.039991 50.873910,-1.040005 50.873904,-1.040009 50.873899,-1.040011 50.873893,-1.040010 50.873887,-1.040006 50.873882,-1.039999 50.873878,-1.039983 50.873875,-1.039966 50.873878,-1.039960 50.873882,-1.039956 50.873887,-1.039954 50.873893)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL